Anti-estrogen and immune modulator combinations for treating breast cancer

ABSTRACT

Compositions for treating cancers of mucosal tissues including breast, prostate, ovary, colon are disclosed which include various combinations of new or conventional anti-estrogen compounds, aromatase inhibitors, immune modulators, immune inhibitors, immune inhibitor mimicking compounds and steroid or thyroid hormones. Methods of predicting susceptibility of a cancer of mucosal origin to treatment with a composition containing an immune inhibitor or an immune inhibitor mimicking compound are also disclosed. Preferred methods include identifying in a specimen of cancer cells the presence of a Poly-Ig (Fe) receptor or Poly-Ig-like (Fc) receptor capable of binding to an immune inhibitor or an immune inhibitor mimicking compound and of mediating immune inhibition of cancer cell growth.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation application of U.S. application Ser.No. 10/293,439, filed Nov. 13, 2002, which is a continuation-in-part ofU.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/852,958, filed May 10, 2001, nowU.S. Pat. No. 7,947,275, issued May 24, 2011 and U.S. patent applicationSer. No. 09/852,547, filed May 10, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,947,463,issued May 24, 2011, which claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) ofU.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/332,801 filed Nov. 14, 2001,U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/231,273, filed Sep. 8, 2000,U.S. Provisional Patent Application No, 60/229,071, filed Aug. 30, 2000,U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/208,111, filed May 31, 2000,U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/208,348, filed May 31, 2000and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/203,314, filed May 10,2000, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference intheir entireties.

STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT

Research leading to the present invention was supported in part by thefederal government under Grant Nos. DAMD17-94-J-4473, DAMD17-98-1-8337and DAMD17-99-1-9405 awarded by the Defense Department through the USArmy Medical Research and Materiel Command, Breast Cancer ResearchProgram. The United States government may have certain rights in theinvention.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of Invention

The present invention generally relates to methods and compositions forthe use of tamoxifen and other anti-estrogenic compounds in combinationwith immune modulator agents (immunoglobulin inhibitors of estrogenresponsive cancer cell growth), to treat or prevent breast cancer.

2. Description of Related Art

In 1896, a British physician named Beatson reported that oophorectomyhad palliative effects for breast cancer patients (1). In 1905, Lettconfirmed this observation with a larger patient trial (2). Clearlyovarian products were either directly or indirectly significant inbreast cancer growth. From these earliest clinical observations,chemical and endocrine research continued and culminated in theidentification of the primary ovarian/follicular agents responsible. Theactive agents proved to be a class of cholesterol derived steroidhormones now designated estrogens. In 1929 and 1930, Doisy andcolleagues crystallized estrogens including estrone[3-hydroxy-estra-1,3,5(10)-trien-17-one] (E₁) from human pregnancy urine(3,12). Bstradiol-17β [estra-1,3,5(10)-triene-3, 17β-diol] (E₂) was alsoisolated from sow follicular fluid (4). The remaining major estrogen,estriol [1,3,5-estratriene-3, 16 α, 17 β-triol] (E₃) has also beendefined.

The relative potency of these three hormones is known today to beE₂>E₁>>>>E₃ (5). With regard to breast cancer cell growth, E₂ and E₁ arein the main considered the most physiologically relevant (6-9). Estriolis most likely relevant during pregnancy when the maternal plasma levelis significantly elevated (10). During pregnancy, maternal E₃ is formedprimarily as a placental conversion product of a steroid produced by thefetal adrenals. Breast cancers are not uncommon during pregnancy(18,22-25). However, all three estrogens are increased in pregnancy(10). In pregnant women, breast cancer is often diagnosed at a laterstage (18). It may be that the elevated hormones during this time causegrowth of developing breast cancer cells in pregnant females (19).Clearly, however, pregnancy has opposing effects on breast cancerdevelopment. On the one hand the increase in hormones can promote cancercell growth (35). On the other hand, pregnancy and high hormones inducetissue differentiation that ultimately protects the tissue (20,21).Apparently the elevated estrogen levels in pregnancy explain thetransient increase in short-term risk of breast cancer following termpregnancy (19). The results of several studies indicate that all threeof the estrogenic steroid hormones (i.e. E₂, E₁ and E₃) are important inbreast cancer risk in humans (26-28).

The biosynthesis and metabolism of estrogens and estrogen-relatedsteroid hormones has been reviewed (11). The majority of plasma E₂ andE₁ is synthesized and secreted by cells of the ovarian follicle (29,30).The biochemical synthetic pathway begins with conversion of cholesterolto progesterone, followed by modification of the progestin to formandrogens or androgen-like steroids. To form all three types ofestrogen, the cholesterol origin “A” ring of “androgens” must beconverted to a phenolic structure by the action of aromatases. These keyenzymes in the biosynthesis of estrogens are located in the endoplasmicreticulum of ovarian cells.

Estrogens undergo a variety of metabolic transformations includinghyroxylations, methylations and reduction. Also, the estrogens areconverted to more water-soluble, biologically inactive, glucuronide andsulfate conjugates by the liver. The conjugates are excreted into urineand bile. Earlier studies indicated that estrogen conjugates (e.g.estrone sulfate) might serve as sources of free estrogen in breastcancer cells possessing the appropriate cleaving enzyme(s) to form freesteroid (31). More recent work (32-34) indicates this is unlikely, basedon tissue culture studies with eight different ER⁺ cell lines. Estrogensulfates and glucuronides are cleaved by intestinal flora to regeneratefree estrogens that again appear in the plasma and urine via theenterohepatic circulation (36). A high fiber-low fat diet tends todecrease this process. Other intestinal microbial processes also convertinactive estrogen metabolites to active steroid hormones (37). Thus,recycling of estrogens is entirely possible.

However, the sites of synthesis of estrogenic substances in the body arenot limited to the ovary (13). While it is understood with premenopausalwomen that estrogens are primarily of ovarian origin, this is not thecase in postmenopausal females (38-41). The question is “what is theorigin(s) of estrogens in the postmenopausal female”? This is importantbecause breast cancer rates are much higher in postmenopausal women (42)even though estrogen levels are declining Nonetheless, 80 or 90% ofbreast cancers in postmenopausal women are ER⁺ (43), implying they areestrogen growth promoted. This paradox can be explained in part by thesuggestion that postmenopausal women with higher risk of developingbreast cancer show relatively higher concentrations of endogenousestradiol (44). Also, it is now very clear that adrenal androgenicsteroids can be converted to estrogens via the action of aromataseslocated in mammalian tissues (45). Its activity provides a significantportion of the plasma estrogens even in postmenopausal women (38-41).Aromatase activity has a broad tissue distribution in mammals (45).However, in human women after menopause, adipose tissue is the primarysource of endogenous estrogens (46,47). Indeed, obesity is positivelycorrelated with breast cancer (48). Also, aromatase is present in breasttissue and cells and represents an “intracrine” source of stimulatingsteroid hormone (49). Because of the major role of aromatase ingenerating breast cancer promoting estrogens in postmenopausal women, aseries of aromatase inhibitors has been developed and are now in use aspharmaceutical products or are in and clinical trials as breast cancertreatments (41).

The question of how estrogens regulate target tissue gene expression andgrowth is of great consequence to this discussion. In 1962, Jensen &Jacobsen (14) came to the conclusion that estrogens acted on sex steroidhormone target tissues via specific cellular receptors. By 1972 to 1974,this research was sufficiently advanced to outline the mechanisms ofestrogen action as mediated by an intracellular receptor (15-17). Forseveral years, intense study has proceeded and has been reported innearly 20 thousand publications (PubMed literature search of “estrogenreceptors”). In 1986, the molecular cloning of the original estrogenreceptor, now designated ERα, was reported (50,51). This 64-kDaltonprotein is functionally and structurally related to other receptors andhas been classified as a member of the steroid and thyroid hormonesuperfamily (52). Today, these similar receptors include those forandrogens, corticosteroids, progestins, thyroid hormones, vitamin D andretinoic acid.

Although for several years ERα was acknowledged as the only estrogenreceptor, variants of it were being identified (55,56). However, in1995, another type of estrogen receptor, designated ERβ, was cloned froma rat prostate and ovary (57). This initiated a boom of new activity todefine the function and properties of ERβ (58,60,61). Indeed, theresults suggest that the role of estrogens in male accessory organfunction deserves renewed study (58). The characteristics and propertiesof ERα versus ERβ have been reviewed (58,61,63). For the purposes ofthis disclosure, it should be noted that the binding affinities of bothreceptors are approximately equal (61). This was expected. However, onestartling fact has surfaced. Mice gene knockout experiments for both ERα(62) and ERβ (60) have confirmed developmental functions for both ofthese receptors, but have fallen short of providing conclusive evidencethat either receptor regulates growth (58). In fact, transfection of ER⁻cells with a functional ERα led to an estrogen-induced inhibition ofcell growth (59). There is a possibility that ERα is a receptorregulating expression of differentiated functions. It is well recognizedthat growth and differentiation are opposing cell functional states.Differentiated cells divide only slowly if at all. This issue has beenreviewed in detail in recent U.S. patent application Ser. Nos.09/852,547 and 09/852,958 and in International Patent Application Nos.PCT/US01/15171 (WO 01/86307) and PCT/US01/15183 (WO 01/85210), alsoidentified in the list of References, below, as items 53 and 54, andhereby incorporated herein by reference). This led to the proposal inthose applications that there is another growth regulating estrogenreceptor, tentatively designated ERγ (53,54).

The characteristics of ERγ are that it binds estrogens with 10 to100-fold higher affinities than ERα or ERβ. Furthermore, it is proposedthat this receptor is a new gene that is expressed in all estrogengrowth responsive target tissues. Data obtained indicate that thisreceptor is present in eight well-known estrogen responsive tumor celllines derived from four tissues and three species including human(32-34,53,54).

However, there exist potential alternatives regarding the identity ofERγ. Investigators have cloned two ERα-like “orphan receptors” withunknown functions (64,65). Other forms of estrogen receptors appear toarise as gene product splice variants (58,66). Those with majordeletions of the hormone binding domain or the DNA binding domain may beexpected to be inactive with respect to estrogen induced growth ofbreast cancer cells. The function of most of the other types of knownvariants remains to be established.

Another potentially significant variant has been identified. It is apoint mutation that affects the border of the hinge-hormone-bindingdomains (67). This mutation was found in 34% of a series of 59 specimensof premalignant hyperplasia. Transfection of this mutated ERαcausedMCF-7 human breast cancer cells to respond to lower concentrations ofestrogen in culture. The full implications of this mutation await morestudy, but it is clear from the results available at this time, andthose presented in the above-identified patent applications (53,54) andother recent publications (32-34), that MCF-7 as well as T47D andZR-75-1 ER⁺ breast cancer cells respond to very low concentrations of B₂even without transfection of the mutated ERα. It may be possible thatthe hypersensitive mutated receptor (67) is present in all ER⁺ celltypes including those from rat mammary and rat pituitary tumors as wellas from estrogen-induced kidney tumor cells from Syrian hamster (32-34).This means that a specific mechanism must exist for formation of thisreceptor in target tissue cells, or that this receptor is derived from anew gene. The latter possibility implies that the response of ER⁺ cellsto very low concentrations of E₂ involves the proposed new ERγ (53,54).

The currently available knowledge about estrogen function and estrogenreceptors has led to one of the most common treatments for disseminatedand/or local ER⁺ breast cancer, especially in postmenopausal women.Today, selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) are the compoundsof choice (68). The mechanism of action of these drugs is to block thegrowth promoting action of estrogens at the cellular/receptor level, nomatter whether the sex steroid hormones are delivered systemically orformed locally in breast tissue via aromatase action on adrenal steroidprecursors. Hence, these drugs are classified as anti-estrogens. As ageneral mechanism of action, anti-estrogens are thought to interferewith the binding of natural estrogens to the growth promoting estrogenreceptor(s).

The first potent anti-estrogen developed 1958 was MER-25 orethamoxytriphetol (76). It then was used to derive clomiphene (77) whichis now used to treat amenorrhea. Clomiphene was then modified to giverise to tamoxifen (78). Although several anti-estrogens have beendeveloped, only two are currently FDA approved for treatment of humanbreast cancer. These are tamoxifen and toremifene. These, and idoxifeneand droloxifene, are triphenylethylene derivatives. Notably, thetoremifene structure differs from tamoxifen by only a single chlorineatom (69). Since its approval in 1977, tamoxifen has been the SERM ofchoice for treatment of ER⁺ breast cancer worldwide (70). Tamoxifen isclassified as a “mixed” anti-estrogen because it displays bothantagonistic properties (i.e. inhibits breast cancer cell growth) andagnostic properties (i.e. stimulates endometrial cell growth and tumordevelopment) (71).

The action of the anti-estrogens is reversed by lower concentrations ofthe natural estrogens (53,54). The affinity of tamoxifen for theestrogen receptor is 10 to 100-fold less than that of E₂. This iscommonly recognized throughout the endocrine cancer field. It istherefore useful to suppress natural estrogens along with application oftamoxifen treatment. This fact is often not recognized clinically,Postmenopausal women are not completely devoid of estrogens. Tamoxifeneffectiveness is reduced by residual estrogenic steroid hormones. It isalso reduced by the tamoxifen induced elevation of DHEA, E₂ and E₁(81-83). This is an unfortunate side effect of using this drug alone.

One of the commonly cited facts concerning tamoxifen is that it acts atcellular sites separate from the estrogen receptor. It is known toinfluence such cellular activities as protein kinase C as well asseveral other cellular mechanisms including those related to apoptosis(72). Although non-steroid hormone receptor directed actions are usuallyconsidered undesirable, certain very recent co-owned patent disclosures(53,54) describe targeting a non-steroid hormone receptor with new drugcombinations whose actions are based on anti-estrogenaugmentation/mimicking of the inhibition of growth of ER⁺ breast cancercells by the immunoglobulins IgA and IgM of the natural secretory immunesystem. As described (53,54), the secretory immune system acts as aparacrine negative regulator of ER⁺ breast cancer cell growth. Employingnew serum-free defined culture assay methods (53,54), tamoxifen wasshown to mimic the inhibition caused by IgA or IgM in the completeabsence of estrogens. This new tamoxifen function represents a cleardeparture from previous thought concerning how this “mixed function”anti-estrogen acts. Previously, other investigators had reported thattamoxifen inhibited growth factor dependent proliferation of humanbreast cancer cells in cultures devoid of estrogens and estrogen-likeagents (73). However, there was no indication at that time that thisanti-estrogen was capable of acting by mimicking the growth inhibitoryeffects of the natural secretory immune system immunoglobulins IgA, IgMand IgG1.

Another class of anti-estrogens is defined as “pure” because they onlyaffect growth via interaction with estrogen receptors (71). The pureanti-estrogens were discovered about 15 years ago (74). Currently, fivecompounds are under intense investigation (71). They are abbreviated ICI164384, ICI 182780, EM-800, RU 58688 and EM-139 (71). Two of these, ICI164384 and ICI 182780 are in clinical trials. Because tamoxifenresistance develops with time (75), the pure anti-estrogens are thoughtto be useful as second-line therapies after tamoxifen failure (71).

Furthermore, pure anti-estrogens are thought useful because they causeno increase in endometrial cancer (71).

However, the pure anti-estrogens have marked deleterious effects on thecardiovascular and skeletal systems (71), and their usefulness is yet tobe established. There remains a need for effective anti-estrogens andfor combination therapies of tamoxifen or tamoxifen-like drugs and the“pure” anti-estrogens that may be more effective than either class ofdrug alone.

SUMMARY OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

New compositions and methods are provided which advantageously employcompounds having a newly defined immune modulating function, or whichhave the ability to mimic that immune modulating function, or acombination of such compounds. For the purposes of the presentdisclosure, the terms “immune mimic,” “immune modulating,” “immunemodulator,” “immune modulation,” “immune control,” “immune inhibition,”“immune suppressor,” and the like, refer in most instances to the newlyidentified cancer cell growth (i.e., proliferation) inhibitory effect ofthe secretory immune system (i.e., dimeric/polymeric IgA and pentamericIgM) that is mediated by a newly identified Poly-Ig receptor orPoly-Ig-like receptor (also classified as an Fc-like receptor), and notto the usual antibody/antigen recognition based immune function of theimmune system. In this context, the terms “immune modulation” or “immuneenhancement” refer especially to the modulation or enhancement of thesecell growth inhibitory immunoglobulins of the secretory immune system.The term “immune mimic” refers to a substance (e.g., tamoxifen) that canfunction in a similar manner to an immunoglobulin inhibitor of cellgrowth. In some instances, however, reference is also made herein to“natural immune inhibition,” “immune enhancer,” “immune modulator,”“immune system,” “immune therapy,” and “immune response,” and the like,in which the conventional meanings of those terms are intended and thecontext so indicates, especially when prior art methods, compounds andcompositions are described. Hereinafter, an indication has been made inappropriate instances whether a conventional definition or the “new”meaning, or both, is intended.

In some aspects of the present invention, tamoxifen is used as a breastcancer treatment taldng advantage of its newly identified function as animmune mimic instead of an anti-estrogen. That tamoxifen is a mixedanti-estrogen is well known. It not only binds to cellular estrogenreceptors, but it also has other unrelated sites of cellular action.This new function for tamoxifen makes possible new combination therapiesas well as new diagnostic methods to determine whether breast or othermucosal origin cancers are expected to be susceptible to thesetherapies. It is concluded that combination therapies of tamoxifen andthe “pure” anti-estrogens may be more effective than either class ofdrug alone.

Tamoxifen treatment alone has several positive aspects as well as anumber of negatives. The negatives can be overcome by placing this wellknown anti-estrogen in combinations with other compounds. The preferredcombinations represent those that permit the mixture to act moreeffectively than the individual component alone. The combinations mayinclude two or more breast cancer treatment drugs, some of which areclassified as “pure” anti-estrogens while others are defined as immunemodulators.

In accordance with certain embodiments of the present invention, a newtamoxifen-based therapeutic method is provided, in which tamoxifen actsas an immune inhibitor mimic (“immune mimic”). The method preferablyincludes employing a new diagnostic test to identify breast cancer cellsexpressing the inhibitor-mediating receptor (a Poly-Ig receptor orPoly-Ig like receptor), also classified as an Fe-like receptor, as anindication of sensitivity to cell growth inhibition by tamoxifen.

In accordance with another embodiment, the above-described tamoxifentherapy and diagnostic testing method is extended to mucosal cancersother than breast, including those of the prostate, colon, kidney,bladder, lung, pancreas, nasopharynx, ovary, endometrium, vagina, andcervix.

In still other embodiments, combinations of tamoxifen and aromataseinhibitors are employed to treat breast and gynecologic cancers. In someembodiments, tamoxifen and a “pure” anti-estrogen compound are combinedfor treating breast and gynecologic cancers.

Some embodiments of the present invention provide compositions ortherapeutic methods using chemically modified MER-25 to treat secretoryimmune system related cancers. In some embodiments, MBR-25 or modifiedMER-25 is combined with progesterone or another hormone for treatingbreast cancer. Modified MER-25 or derivative compounds of MER-25 thatmay have satisfactory anti-estrogenic or immune mimicking activityinclude methylated, alkylated, benzylated, halogenated, unsaturations,altered charge properties, and conformationally altered or stereoisomersof MER-25.

In certain embodiments, combinations of tamoxifen and levamisole areused as an immune mimic and immune modulator to treat breast and othermucosal cancers, including colon cancer. In certain embodiments,combinations of tamoxifen and imiquimod are used as an immune mimic andimmune modulator to treat breast and other mucosal cancers. In certainembodiments, tamoxifen and OK-432 (picibanil) are used as an immunemimic and immune modulator to treat breast and other mucosal cancers.

Certain embodiments of the present invention provide compositions ortherapeutic methods employing a combination of tamoxifen and DHEA(dehydroepiandrosterone) as an immune mimic and immune modulator totreat breast and other mucosal cancers. In certain embodiments, atherapeutic method is provided in which tamoxifen and an Fc-likereceptor gene therapy are used together to treat breast and othermucosal cancers.

In still other embodiments of the invention, methods are provided foridentifying anti-estrogenic compounds or for evaluating modified formsof existing compounds that might be more effective anti-estrogenicagents. These methods employ cell growth assays that, preferably, usecertain serum-containing or serum-free media. In some embodiments,methods are provided for screening new compounds and for determining howcombinations of compounds act on cells directly. These and otherembodiments, features and advantages of the present invention willbecome apparent with reference to the following description.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS Example 1 TamoxifenTherapy and New Diagnostic Test for Immune Modulation Applications withBreast Cancer

Co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 09/852,958 and09/852,547/PCT Published Application Nos. WO 01/86307 and WO 01/85210establish that tamoxifen mimics the cell growth inhibitory actions ofthe secretory immune system immunoglobulins IgA and IgM (53,54). Thedisclosures of those applications are hereby incorporated herein byreference. The immunoglobulin action is mediated by a Poly-Ig receptoror a Poly-Ig-like receptor (also classified as an Fe-like receptor) thatis identified by antibody raised against the extracellular five domainscommonly called the “secretory component” (SC) (86). Those breast cancercells expressing this Fc-like receptor are sensitive to inhibition bytamoxifen. Those cells not expressing the Fc-like receptor are nottamoxifen sensitive, Because the analysis can be done in completelyserum-free defined medium (53,54) without estrogens, it is concludedthat tamoxifen acts to mimic the Fc-like receptor mediated inhibition ofcell growth by secretory immune system IgA and IgM. Usingimmunohistochemical analysis methods (88), breast cancer specimens willbe examined for SC positive receptors. It has already been demonstratedthat this methodology will identify breast cancers at the early stagewhen they are expressing an SC detectable receptor (87). These tumorsare candidates for immune mimicking regulation. Those tumors that areFc-like receptor positive are candidates for tamoxifen therapy orcombined therapy with tamoxifen and the other agents described below. Asa specific test is developed to detect the ERγ, the use of double labelfluorescence will permit very accurate determination of patients thatare strong candidates for the therapies described.

It is expected that tamoxifen inhibits breast cancer cell growth not byinteraction with the commonly recognized ERα or ERβ but instead with theERγ (53,54). The direct histochemical measurement of ERγ is expected tosignificantly increase the reliability of the decision to initiateanti-estrogen therapy. Further, the identification of ERγ will permitreanalysis of existing and new compounds for anti-ERγ activity. Thisapproach can be expected to significantly advance how new SERMs areselected.

Example 2 Tamoxifen Therapy and New Diagnostic Test for ImmuneModulation Applications with other Mucosal Cancers including Prostate,Colon, Kidney, Bladder Lung, Pancreas, Nasopharynx, Ovarian,Endometrial, Vaginal and Cervical Cancer

The analysis outlined in Example 1 will be used to determine theapplication of the tamoxifen-based therapies to tumors arising fromother mucosal tissues. Since the same secretory immune system isfunctional in all of the tissues (prostate, colon, kidney, bladder,lung, pancreas, nasopharynx, ovary, endometrium, vagina and cervix), theimmunohistochemical analysis for SC detectable Fc-like receptor can beconducted. It has already been shown (89) that colon cancers progressthrough stages in which the SC is expressed (i.e. early differentiatedtumors) to stages in which there is little or no detectable SC (i.e.late malignancy stage). Tamoxifen and/or the combinations described willbe used to treat Fc-like receptor positive (FUR⁺) tumors by the newprotocols. This new approach is expected to provide an expandedrationale for the use of tamoxifen to treat cancers not yet recognizedas sensitive to this immune mimicking anti-estrogen. Further, as a testfor ERγ is developed, it can be used to further refine the tumor typessusceptible to the new modes of tamoxifen combination therapies.

Example 3 Combinations of Tamoxifen and Aromatase Inhibitors to TreatBreast and Gynecologic Cancers

It is proposed that simultaneous treatment with aromatase inhibitors andtamoxifen will be more effective than either drug alone. The therapeuticpotential of this new combination is all the more significant in view ofthe fact that aromatase inhibitors do not completely inhibit estrogensynthesis. An unfortunate side effect of tamoxifen treatment is that itincreases the concentration of estrogens in the plasma, which will havea marked effect on reducing the potency of tamoxifen as ananti-estrogen. The simultaneous use of aromatase inhibitors is expectedto suppress this estrogen inductive effect and therefore may help toresolve the problem of escape of tumors from tamoxifen inhibition. Inconventional therapies, tamoxifen resistance is currently thought to bea major problem with longer-term tamoxifen treatment. As additionaltumor types beyond breast are identified as tamoxifen sensitive (e.g.endometrial, ovarian, vaginal, cervical and possibly prostate), thecombined tamoxifen-aromatase inhibitor therapy will have even broaderapplication than is recognized today for either drug.

Example 4 Combinations of Tamoxifen and Pure Anti-estrogens to TreatBreast and Gynecologic Cancers

The negative aspect of the current “pure” anti-estrogens discussed aboveis that they deplete the body of estrogen action so effectively thatthere are major cardiovascular and skeletal problems. However, by usingthe combination of tamoxifen and the “pure” anti-estrogens, the agonistaction of tamoxifen can be expected to reduce this problem withoutsupplying unwanted natural estrogens. Tamoxifen has positive effects onboth the cardiovascular system and bone. Furthermore, it is expectedthat this combination will also reduce the problem of induction ofendometrial cancers thought today to be a problem with the use oftamoxifen alone. Hence, the combination reduces major negative aspectsseen with each drug alone. The balance of the two components can bevaried to achieve specific end points.

Example 5 Use of Chemically Modified MER-25 to Treat Secretory ImmuneSystem Related Cancers

MER-25 is an anti-estrogen by virtue of its inhibitory effects onestrogen target tissues. It also has the benefit that it does notinteract with the estrogen receptor to accomplish its action (79). Theadvantage of MER-25 (or its modified forms) is that systemic or locallyproduced estrogens will not interfere, Thus, it can be used with ER⁺pre- and postmenopausal women without concern for suppression ofendogenous estrogen levels. The results available support the presentsuggestion that MER-25 may mimic the immune activity of IgA and IgM evenmore strongly than tamoxifen.

Early anti-estrogens such as MER-25 were by-passed by previousinvestigators because of their potency and adverse side effects,Although MER-25 has many desirable properties as an anti-estrogen, ithas been reported to be too toxic for use in humans (78). However, ifMER-25 and related compounds can be modified to achieve high levels ofimmune modulation without the serious side effects, this will openadditional new avenues of breast cancer therapy.

Accordingly, the chemical structure will be modified particularly in theO—C—C—N segment of the side chain to change the conformation and toprevent hydrogen bonding with neighboring hydroxyl groups (80). Onlylimited modifications in MER-25 have been sought (84). Other chemicalchanges in the structure are expected to attenuate the side effectsconsidered most severe. Computer based molecular modeling will be usedto develop the chemical modifications. The modifications are expected toinclude, for example, methylation, halogenation, unsaturations,alterations on charged groups, changes in conformation and selection ofstable stereoisomers of the MER-25 structure. The chemically modifiedforms will be evaluated for anti-estrogenic activity using both theserum-containing and serum-free assay methods described in co-owned U.S.and PCT patent applications (53,54), incorporated herein by reference.This is a rapid and effective method of determining when a derivativehas been obtained that still retains the desired potency againstestrogen target cells in culture but cannot be reversed by exogenousestrogens in culture. Those that are effective under the strict testsoutlined (53,54) will be tested for in vivo anti-tumor activity usingrat mammary and pituitary models as well as with xenografts of humanbreast cancer cell lines in athymic nude mice.

Example 6 Combinations of MER-25 and Modified MER-25 with Progesteroneand other Hormones

The undesirable side effects of MER-25 and chemically modified forms mayalso be attenuated by simultaneous treatment with progesterone. In otherstudies, it has been shown that eating behavior and body weightregulation are affected by MER-25 (85). The administration ofprogesterone in rats corrected those side effects. Thus, at least someadverse properties in vivo may be due to altered hormonal influences.Administration of MER-25, and derivative compounds, will be evaluatedfor causation of endocrine changes. Any changes identified will becorrected by simultaneous application of the appropriate hormone(s).MER-25 or one of its derivatives may influence, for example, pituitaryhormone secretion, thyroid hormones, adrenal hormones and/or neurogenicamines. Cytokines are also included in this group. Such changes areexpected to yield the severe side effects reported (78). Accordingly, ahormone derived from pituitary, adrenals or thyroid, or a cytokine or aneurogenic hormone may be administered together with MER-25 or amodified form of MER-25 to deter the occurrence of side effects from thedrug.

Example 7 Combination Tamoxifen and Levamisole as Immune Mimic andImmune Modulator to Treat Breast and Other Mucosal Cancers includingColon

Levamisole is known to be immunoregulatory at multiple levels (90). Itis known to enhance an impaired immune system (91). Levamisole iscurrently used to treat Stage III colon cancer, and is recognized to bean immunostimulant, in the conventional sense, to assist the naturalimmune system (92). Drawing from the inventor's prior observations thatincreased secretory immunoglobulins IgA and IgM are not only cytostaticfor breast cancer cells, but also cytotoxic, therapies that enhanceimmune function, increasing the presence of these secretoryimmunoglobulins in particular, are thus expected to be beneficial. Ithas been shown by others that a general elevation of the immune systemby levamisole can retard colon cancer, but is not completely effective.The addition of tamoxifen is expected to enhance cancer cell death viaapoptosis mechanisms. The diagnostic test for SC outlined above can beused to decide which patients should receive a combinedlevamisole/tamoxifen therapy.

Together, the combination of levamisole and tamoxifen for breast canceris expected to have effects beyond that achievable with each compoundalone. Levamisole will enhance the natural immune inhibition of breastcancer growth while tamoxifen offers an additional direct cellulareffect. This combination approaches therapy from two different aspectsof regulation. The use of levamisole to treat breast cancer is a newapplication, particularly when placed in combination with tamoxifen.Other components of preferred therapeutic compositions include aromataseinhibitors and/or “pure” anti-estrogens.

Example 8 Combination Tamoxifen and Imiquimod as Immune Mimic and ImmuneModulator to Treat Breast and Other Mucosal Cancers

Imiquimod is a conventional immune enhancer that is effective both as atopical preparation and when administered orally (93,94). The known useof this compound in breast cancer therapy is based on the action ofinterferon which is induced by imiquimod. The drug alone has onlylimited long term effects. Imiquimod therapy is expected to be highlyeffective in combination with an anti-estrogen such as tamoxifen or anew MER-25 derivative. The elevation of interferon affects the immunesystem as well as having potential effects directly on breast cancercells. The addition of tamoxifen is expected to enhance any effects ofinterferon. This combination has three possible cytostatic/cytotoxicmodes. First is the direct effect of the anti-estrogen. Second is animmune enhancing action of imiquimod, which is expected to includeenhancement of the secretory immunoglobulin inhibitors of cancer cellgrowth. Third is the direct cytotoxic effect of interferon. Thismodality may be enhanced by measurement of the interferon receptor inbreast specimens along with the Fc-like receptor,

Example 9 Combination Tamoxifen and OK-432 (Picibanil) as Immune Mimicand Immune Modulator to Treat Breast and Other Mucosal Cancers

Ok-432 (Picibanil) is a streptococcal preparation that has a strongimmune modulating effect (95), employing the conventional meaning of“immune modulating,” which generally refers to the antibody/antigenrecognition function of the immune system. The active moiety of thispreparation has not been identified. This preparation cannot bedelivered orally. It has been used in breast cancer as intratumorinjections (96). In those prior studies, the results were mixed butadditional results from cell culture suggest that a combination with ananti-estrogen may have greater effect than OK-432 alone (97). Anotherroute to administration of OK-432 is intrapleural administration, whichwas evaluated as a treatment for breast malignancy in pleural effusions(98). The results of the conventional immune therapy alone ondisseminated breast cancer were encouraging. It is now proposed that thecombination of OK-432 with tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor willprovide additional benefits and have anti-cancer effects beyond thosethat could have previously been predicted for OK-432 and tamoxifen, Therole of OK-432 may be direct on tumor cells, or may involve a criticalconventional immune response that then suppresses tumor cell growth. Anadditional possible use of this preparation may be as an oral challengeto develop mucosal immunity as described (53,54). This route ofadministration and development of mucosal immunity represents anentirely new approach to the use of this immune modulator.

Example 10 Combination Tamoxifen and DHEA (dehydroepiandrosterone) asImmune Mimic and Immune Modulator to Treat Breast and Other MucosalCancers

One recent report (101) asks the question “is DHEA a panacea or snakeoil”? The answer likely rests with proper experimental design. DHEA usemust be critically evaluated to achieve meaningful results, For example,the use of DHEA as a conventional immune modulator has been evaluated inpostmenopausal women (99). That report stated that evidence was clearthat DHEA was a positive immune modulator in these females. Furthermore,it was considered useful that DHEA metabolism in breast yields androgensthat likely act as inhibitors of breast cancer growth. However, theevidence with a combination of DHEA and the “pure” anti-estrogen EM-800with ZR-75-1 breast cancer cell xenografts in athymic nude mice were notas encouraging (100). DHEA inhibited alone, and the “pure” anti-estrogenalone inhibited. These results are pointed out to demonstrate that theproposal of using the “mixed” anti-estrogen tamoxifen with DHEA hasmerit. Tamoxifen acts as a direct immune mimic, as described in Example1, in addition to blocking the estrogen receptor. DHEA acts to stimulatethe immune system and to deliver inhibitory androgens to breast cancercells. It is believed that the conventional immune stimulatory action ofDHEA will also serve to enhance the presence of the inhibitory secretoryimmunoglobulins. This multilevel approach is expected to be moreeffective than each of the compounds used alone. It is also expected tobe more effective than use of a “pure” antiestrogen with only onemechanism of action. In addition, this combination may be even moreeffective when an aromatase inhibitor is added. Indeed, but applying theimmunohistochemical classifications outlined above, along withdetermining the androgen receptor content, the combination therapy has astrong rational basis. Today androgen receptors are rarely measured inspecimens of female breast cancer.

Example 11 Combination Tamoxifen and Fe-like Receptor Gene therapy toTreat Breast and Other Mucosal Cancers

Because tamoxifen is effective only with cells that express the Poly-Ig(Fc) receptor or a Poly-Ig-like (Fc) receptor, introduction of thisreceptor into cells lacking immune control offers an entirely newapproach to treatment of breast and other mucosal cancers. Viral vectorsbearing the DNA coding for the full length functional Fc-like receptorcan be used to transform disseminated cancer such that the tumor cellsregain sensitivity to tamoxifen. This is a significant concept becauseit permits activation of killing over a long duration and with multipleexposures to the virus plus tamoxifen. Since tamoxifen can typically beused over a five-year period, and viral infections repeated, this newapproach has considerable promise and is supported by the recognizedfact that all cancer cells will not be killed after even the first fewviral infections. The properties of the receptor to be used have beendescribed (53,54), and techniques for incorporating a desired DNAsequence into a suitable viral vector, and for transforming a populationof cells are known and have been described in the literature.

Example 12 Use of Serum-Containing and Serum-free Medium Assays toDefine New Anti-estrogenic Compounds or to Modify Existing Compounds toMore Effective Agents:

The above-identified co-owned U.S and PCT patent applications (53,54),hereby incorporated herein by reference, describe two different types ofassays that will be used to characterize new anti-estrogenic compoundsand derivatives. One assay is done with ER⁺ cell lines grown in mediumsupplemented with steroid hormone depleted serum. The serum ispreferably prepared by either charcoal dextran extraction, or by XAD-4resin treatment (53,54). Similar assays can be done under completelyserum-free defined conditions. The results of the two assays can becompared directly. Several suitable cell lines for use in the assays areavailable from three different species and four different tissues(32-34), although another cell line that is capable of growing both incell culture and when implanted into a compatible host could also beused. Use of steroid hormone depleted serum permits evaluation of itseffect on the activity of the new compound. The presence of serumfactors may alter activity and therefore indicate problems beforeinitiation of time consuming and expensive animal testing.

REFERENCES

-   (1) Beatson G T (1896) On treatment of inoperable cases of carcinoma    of the mamma:

suggestions for a new method of treatment with illustrative cases.Lancet (Part 1) July 11:104 -107; (Part 2) July 18:162-165.

-   (2) Lett H (1905) An analysis of 99 cases of inoperable carcinoma of    the breast treated by öophorectomy. Lancet January 28:227-228.-   (3) Doisy E A, Veler C D & Thayer S (1929) Folliculin from urine of    pregnant women. Am

J Physiol 90:329-330.

-   (4) MacCorquodale D W, Thayer S A & Doisy E A (1936) The isolation    of the principal estrogenic substance of liquor folliculi. J Biol    Chem 115:435-448.-   (5) Clark J H & Markaverich B M (1983) The agonistic and    antagonistic effects of short acting estrogens: a review. Pharm Ther    21:429-453.-   (6) Lippman M E, Monaco M E & Bolan G (1977) Effects of estrone,    estradiol, and estriol on hormone responsive human breast cancer in    long term tissue culture. Cancer Res 37:1901-1907.-   (7) Jozan S, Moure C, Gillois M & Bayard F (1979) Effects of estrone    on cell proliferation of human breast cancer (MCF-7) in long term    tissue culture. J Steroid Biochem 10:341-342.-   (8) Katzenellenbogen B S (1984) Biology and receptor interactions of    estriol and estradiol derivatives in vitro and in vivo. J Steroid    Biochem 20:1033-1037.-   (9) Karey K P & Sirbasku D A (1988) Differential responsiveness of    the human breast cancer cell lines MCF-7 and T47-D to growth factors    and 17β-estradiol. Cancer Res 48:4083-4092.-   (10) Freinkel N & Metzger B E (1992) Metabolic changes in pregnancy.    In: Williams Textbook of Endocrinology, 8^(th) Edition, Wilson J D &    Foster D W (eds), W B Saunders Company, Philadelphia, pp 993-1005.-   (11) Gore-Langton & Armstrong D T (1988) Folicular steroidogenesis    and its control. In: The Physiology of Reproduction, Knobile E &    Neill J D (Eds-in-chief), Raven Press, New York, pp 331-385.-   (12) Doisy E A, Veler C D & Thayer S A (1930) The preparation of the    crystalline ovarian hormone from the urine of pregnant women. Am J    Physiol 86:499-509.-   (13) Corner G W (1983) The sites of formation of estrogenic    substances in the animal body. Physiol Rev 18:154-172.-   (14) Jensen E V & Jacobsen H I (1962) Basic guides to the mechanism    of estrogen action, Recent Prog Horm Res 18:387-414.-   (15) Jensen E V & DeSombre E R (1972) Mechanism of action of the    female sex hormones. Ann Rev Biochem 41:203-230.-   (16) Jensen E V & DeSombre E R (1973) Estrogen-receptor interaction.    Estrogenic hormones effect transformation of specific receptor    proteins to a biochemically functional form, Science (Washington    D.C.) 182:126-134.-   (17) O'Malley B W & Means A R (1974) Female steroid hormones and    target cell nuclei. Science (Washington D.C.) 183:610-620.-   (18) Gemignani M L & Petrek J A (2000) Breast cancer during    pregnancy: diagnostic and therapeutic dilemmas. Adv Surg 34:273-286.-   (19) Lambe M, Hsieh C-C, Trichopoulos D, Ekbom A, Pavia M & Adami    H-O (1994) Transient increase in the risk of breast cancer after    giving birth. N Eng J Med 331:5-9.-   (20) Miller W R (1993) Hormonal factors and risk of breast cancer.    Lancet 341:25-26.-   (21) MacMahon B (1993) General Motors Cancer Research Prizewinners    Laureates

Lectures, Charles S. Mott Prize. Reproduction and cancer of the breast.Cancer 71:85-88.

-   (22) Ibrahim E M, Ezzat A A, Baloush A, Hussain Z F I & Mohammed G    H (2000) Pregnancy-associated breast cancer: a case-control study in    a young population with high fertility rate. Med Oncol 17:293-300.-   (23) Gwyn K & Theriault R (2001) Breast cancer during pregnancy.    Oncology (Huntingt) 15:39-46; discussion 46.-   (24) Moore H C & Foster R S Jr (2000) Semin Oncol 27:646-653.-   (25) Gemignani M L, Petrek J A & Borgen P I (1999) Breast cancer and    pregnancy. Surg Clin North Am 79:1157-1169.-   (26) Key T J (1999) Serum oestradiol and breast cancer risk.    Endocrine-Related Cancer 6:175-180.-   (27) Persson I (2000) Estrogens in the causation of breast,    endometrial and ovarian cancers—evidence and hypotheses from    epidemiological findings. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 74:357-364.-   (28) Hulka B S & Moorman P G (2001) Breast cancer: hormones and    other risk factors. Maturitas 38:103-113; discussion 113-116.-   (29) Ross G T & Vande Wiele R L (1974) Chapter 7: The Ovaries. In:    Textbook of Endocrinology, 5^(th) Edition, Williams R H (ed), W B    Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 368-422.-   (30) Williams C L & Stancel G M (1995) Chapter 57: Estrogens and    Progestins. In: 9^(th) Goodman & Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis    of Therapeutics, 9^(th) Edition, Hardman J G & Limbird L E    (Eds-in-Chief), McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 1411-1440.-   (31) Vignon F, Terqui M, Westley B, Derocq D & Rochefort H (1980)    Effects of plasma estrogen sulfates in mammary cancer cells.    Endocrinology 106:1079-1086.-   (32) Moreno-Cuevas J E & Sirbasku D A (2000) Estrogen mitogenic    action. I. Demonstration of estrogen-dependent MTW9/P12    carcinogen-induced rat mammary tumor cell growth in    serum-supplemented culture and technical implications. In Vitro Cell    Dev Biol 36:410-427.-   (33) Sirbasku D A & Moreno-Cuevas J E (2000) Estrogen mitogenic    action. II. Negative regulation of the steroid hormone-responsive    growth of cell lines derived from human and rodent target tissue    tumors and conceptual implications. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol    36:428-446.-   (34) Moreno-Cuevas J E & Sirbasku D A (2000) Estrogen mitogenic    action. III. Is phenol red a “red herring”? In Vitro Cell Dev Biol    36:447-464.-   (35) Petrek J A (1994) Breast cancer and pregnancy. J Nati Cancer    Inst Monograph 16:113-121.-   (36) Gorbach S L (1984) Estrogens, breast cancer, and intestinal    flora. Rev Infect Dis Suppl 1:S85-S90.-   (37) Axelson M & Sjovall J (1983) Formation of catechol estrogens by    intestinal bacterial demethylation of 2-methoxyestrone. Biochim    Biophys Acta 751:162-165.-   (38) Simpson E R (2000) Role of aromatase in sex steroid action. J    Mol Endocrinol 25:149-156.-   (39) Longcope C (2001) Endocrine function of the postmenopausal    ovary. J Soc Gynecol Investig 8 (suppl):S67-S68.-   (40) Van Zonneveld P, Scheffer G J, Broekmans F J M & to Velde E    R (2001) Hormones and reproductive aging. Maturitas 38:83-94.-   (41) Kuerer H M, Buzdar A U & Singletary S E (2001) Biologic basis    and evolving role of armoatase inhibitors in the management of    invasive carcinoma of the breast. J Surg Oncol 77:139-147.-   (42) Ries L A G, Kosary C L, Hankey B F et al (1999) “SEER Cancer    Statistics Review, 1973-1996”. Bethesda, Maryland: National Cancer    Institute.-   (43) Diab S G, Elledge R M & Clark G M (2000) Tumor characteristics    and clinical outcome of elderly women with breast cancer. J Natl    Cancer Inst 92:550-556.-   (44) Thomas H V, Reeves G K & Key T J (1997) Endogenous estrogen and    postmenopausal breast cancer: a quantitative review. Cancer Causes    Control 8:922-928.-   (45) Conley A & Hinshelwood M (2001) Mammalian aromatases.    121:685-695.-   (46) Siiteri P K & MacDonald P C (1973) Role of extraglandular    oestrogen in human endocrinology. In: Handbook of Physiology, Volume    2, Greep R o & Astwood E B (eds) American Physiology Society,    Washington D.C., pp 619-629.-   (47) Simpson E R, Zhao Y, Agarwal V R, Michael M D et al (1997)    Aromatase expression in health and disease. Recent Prog Horm Res    52:185-213.-   (48) Huang Z, Hankinson S E, Colditz G A, Stampfer M J et al (1997)    Dual effects of weight and weight gain on breast cancer risk. JAMA    278:1407-1411.-   (49) Labrie F, Belanger A, Cusan L & Candas B (1997) J Clin    Endocrinol Metab 82:2403-2409.-   (50) Green S, Walter P, Kumar V Krust A et al (1986) Human oestrogen    receptor cDNA: sequence, expression and homology to verb-A. Nature    320:134-139.-   (51) Greene G L, Gilna P, Waterfield M, Baker A, Hort Y & Shine    J (1986) Sequence and expression of the estrogen receptor    complimentary DNA. Science (Washington D.C.) 231:1150-1154.-   (52) Evans R M (1988) The steroid and thyroid hormone receptor    superfamily, Science (Washington D.C.) 240:889-895.-   (53) Sirbasku, David A. “Compositions and Methods for the Diagnosis,    Treatment and Prevention of Steroid Hormone Responsive Cancers” U.S.    patent application Ser. No. 09/852,547 (U.S. Published Application    No. 20020006630) and corresponding PCT Published Application No. WO    01/86307.-   (54) Sirbasku, David A. “Compositions and Methods for Demonstrating    Secretory Immune System Regulation of Steroid Hormone Responsive    Cancer Cell Growth” U.S. Pat. No. 09/852,958 (U.S. Published    Application No. 20020012954 and corresponding PCT Published    Application No. WO 01/85210.-   (55) Fuqua S A W , Fitzgerald S D, Chamness G C, Tandon A K et    al (1991) A variant human breast tumor estrogen receptor with    constitutive transcriptional activity. Cancer Res 51:105-109.-   (56) Zhang Q-X, Borg A, Wolf D M, Oesterreich S & Fuqua S A W (1997)    An estrogen receptor mutant with strong hormone-independent activity    from metastatic breast cancer, Cancer Res 57:1244-1249.-   (57) Kuiper G G, Enmark E, Pelto-Huikko M, Nilsson S & Gustafsson    J-A (1996) Cloning of a novel receptor expressed in rat prostate and    ovary. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:5925-5930.-   (58) Nilsson S, Makela S, Treuter E, Tujaque M et al (2001)    Mechanisms of estrogen action. Physiol Rev 81:1535-1565.-   (59) Zajchowski D A, Sager R & Webster L (1993) Estrogen inhibits    the growth of estrogen receptor-negative, but not estrogen    receptor-positive, human mammary epithelial cells expressing a    recombinant estrogen receptor. Cancer Res 53:5004-5011.-   (60) Gustafsson J-A & Warner M (2000) Estrogen receptor β in the    breast: role in estrogen responsiveness and development of breast    cancer. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 74:245-248.-   (61) Dickson R B & Stancel G M (1999) Chapter 8: Estrogen    receptor-mediated processes in normal and cancer cells. J Natl    Cancer Inst Monographs No. 27:135-145.-   (62) Couse J F & Korach K S (1999) Estrogen receptor null mice: what    have we learned and where will they lead us? Endocr Rev 20:358-417.-   (63) Couse J F, Curtis-Hewitt S & Korach K S (2000) Receptor null    mice reveal contrasting roles for estrogen receptor α and β in    reproductive tissues. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 74:287-296.-   (64) Giguere V, Yang N, Seui V & Evans R M (1988) Identification of    a new class of steroid hormone receptors. Nature 331:91-94.-   (65) Beato M & Klug J (2000) Steroid hormone receptors: an update.    Human Reproduction Update 6:225-236.-   (66) Hopp T & Fuqua S (1998) Estrogen receptor variants. J Mammary    Gland Biol Neoplasia 3:73-83.-   (67) Fuqua S A, Wiltschke C, Zhang Q X, Borg A et al (2000) A    hypersensitive estrogen receptor alpha mutation in premalignant    breast lesions, Cancer Res 60:4026-4029.-   (68) Goldstein S R, Siddhanti S, Ciaccia A V & Plouffe L Jr (2000) A    pharmacological review of selective oestrogen receptor modulators.    Human Reprod Update 6:212-224.-   (69) Buzdar A U & Hortobagyi G N (1998) Tamoxifen and toremifene in    breast cancer: comparison of safety and efficacy. J Clin Oncol    16:348-353.-   (70) Buzdar A U & Hortobagyi G (1998) Update on endocrine therapy    for breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 4:527-534.-   (71) Hermenegildo C & Cano A (2000) Pure anti-estrogens. Human    Reproduction Update 6:237-243.-   (72) Mandlekar S & Kong A N (2001) Mechanism of tamoxifen-induced    apoptosis. Apoptosis 6:469-477.-   (73) Vignon F, Bouton M-M & Rochefort H (1987) Antiestrogens inhibit    the mitogenic effect of growth factors on breast cancer cells in the    total absence of estrogens. Biochem Biophys Res Commun    146:1502-1508.-   (74) Wakeling A E & Bowler J (1987) Steroidal pure antiestrogens. J    Endocrinol 112:R7-R10.-   (75) Jordan V C (1993) A current view of tamoxifen for the treatment    and prevention of breast cancer. Br J Pharmacol 110:507-517.-   (76) Lerner L J, Holthaus F G & Thompson C R (1958) The    non-steroidal estrogen antagonist (MER-25). Endocrinology    63:295-318.-   (77) Greenblatt R B, Roy S, Mahesh V B et al (1962) Induction of    ovulation. Am J Obstetrics Gynecology 84:900-909.-   (78) Lerner L J & Jordan V C (1990) Development of antiestrogens and    their use in breast cancer. Cancer Res 50:4177-4189.-   (79) Lyman S D & Jordan V C (1985) Possible mechanisms for the    agonist actions of tamoxifen and the antagonist actions of MER-25    (ethamoxytriphetol) in mouse uterus. Biochem Pharmacol 34:2795-2806.-   (80) Hossain M B, Symersky J, Neely S C, van der Helm D & Magarian    RA (1993) Structure of    1-(4-[2-(diethylamino)ethoxy]phenyl)-2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-1-phenylethan-1-ol,    the non-steroidal antiestrogen MER-25. Acta Crystallogr 49:500-504.-   (81) Lonning P e, Johannessen D C, Lien E A et at (1995) Influence    of tamoxifen on sex hormones, gonadotrophins and sex hormone binding    globulin in postmenopausal breast cancer patients. J Steroid Biochem    Mol Biol 52:491-496.-   (82) Geisler J, Haarstad H, Gunderson S et al (1995) Influence of    treatment with the antiestrogen 3-hydroxytamoxifen (droloxifene) on    plasma sex hormone levels in postmenopausal patients with breast    cancer. J Endocrinol 146:359-363.-   (83) Lum S S, Woltering E A, Fletcher W S et al (1997) Changes in    serum estrogen levels in women during tamoxifen therapy. Am J Surg    173:399-402.-   (84) Clark E R & Jordan V C (1976) Oestrogenic, anti-oestrogenic and    fertility effects of some triphenylethanes and triphenylethylenes    related to ethamoxytriphetol (MER-25). Br J Pharmacol 57:487-493.-   (85) Roy E J & Uade G N (1976) Estrogenic effects of an    antiestrogen, MER-25, on eating and body weight in rats. J Comp    Physiol Psychol 90:156-166.-   (86) Krajci P, Kvale D, Tasken K & Brandtzaeg P (1992) Molecular    cloning and exon-intron mapping of the gene encoding human    transmembrane secretory component (the Poly-Ig receptor). Eur J    Immunol 22:2309-2315.-   (87) Stern J E, Underdown B J, Crichlow R W & Wira C R (1985)    Secretory component in breast cancer. Analysis of the levels in    primary and metastatic disease, Cancer Immunol Immunother    19:226-230.-   (88) Brandtzaeg P & Rognum T O (1984) Evaluation of nine different    fixatives. 1.

Preservation of immunoglobulin isotypes, J chain, and secretorycomponent in human tissues. Path Res Pract 179:250-266.

-   (89) Krajci P, Meling G I, Andersen S N et al (1996) Secretory    component mRNA and protein expression in colorectal adenomas and    carcinomas. Br J Cancer 73:1503-1510.-   (90) Goldstein G (1978) Mode of action of levamisole. J Rheumatol    Suppl 4:143-148.-   (91) Prakash M S, Rao V M & Reddy V (1998) Effect of levamisole on    the immune status of malnourished children. J Trop Pediatrics    44:165-166.-   (92) Holcombe R F, Li A & Stewart R M (1998) Levamisole and    interleukin-2 for advanced malignancy. Biotherapy 11:255-258.-   (93) Savage P, Horton V, Moore J et al (1996) A phase I trial    clinical trial of imiquimod, an oral interferon inducer,    administered daily. Br J Cancer 74:1482-1486.-   (94) Witt P L, Ritch P S, Reding D et al (1993) Phase I trial of an    oral immunomodularor and interferon inducer in cancer patients.    Cancer Res 53:5176-5180.-   (95) Chirigos M A (1992) Immunomodulators: current and future    development and application. Thymus 19 (suppl):S7-S20.-   (96) Takeda T, Kobayashi T, Monden T et al (1993) The effect of    local immunotherapy for breast cancer using a mixture of OK-432 and    fibrinogen supplemented with activated macrophages. Biotherapy    7:47-53.-   (97) Aoyagi H, Iino Y, Takeo T et al (1997) Effects of OK-432    (picibanil) on estrogen receptors of MCF-7 cells and potentiation of    antiproliferative effects of tamoxifen in combination with OK-432.    Oncology 54:414-423.-   (98) Kan N, Kodama H, Hori T et al (1993) Intrapleural adaptive    immunotherapy for breast cancer patients with    cytologically-confirmed malignant pleural effusions: an analysis of    67 patients in Kyoto and Shiga Prefecture, Japan. Breast Cancer Res    Treat 27:203-210.-   (99) Casson P R, Andersen R N, Herrod H G et al (1993) Oral    dehydroepiandrosterone in physiologic doses modulates immune    function in postmenopausal women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 169:1536-1539.-   (100) Couillard S, Labrie C, Belanger A et al (1998) Effect of    dehydroepiandrosterone and the antiestrogen EM-800 on growth of    human ZR-75-1 breast cancer xenografts. J Natl Cancer Inst    90:772-778.-   (101) Sirrs S M & Bebb R A (1999) DHEA: panacea or snake oil? Can    Fam Physician 45:1723-1728.

While the preferred embodiments of the invention have been shown anddescribed, modifications thereof can be made by one skilled in the artwithout departing from the spirit and teachings of the invention. Theembodiments described herein are exemplary only, and are not intended tobe limiting. Many variations and modifications of the inventiondisclosed herein are possible and are within the scope of the invention.For example, the foregoing descriptions primarily focus on the treatmentand prevention of breast cancer in high-risk individuals, however thesame or similar approaches can be employed to with respect to othertypes of cancers of mucosal tissues, including prostate, ovary,endometrium, cervix, vagina, colon, kidney, lung, pancreas andnasopharynx. Cancers of those tissues, together with breast cancer,account for 80% of all human cancer. The disclosures of all patents,patent applications and publications cited hereinabove are herebyincorporated herein by reference. The discussion of certain referencesin the Description of Related Art, above, is not an admission that theyare prior art to the present invention, especially any references thatmay have a publication date after the priority date of this application.

1-8. (canceled)
 9. A method of treating breast cancer in an individualin need of such treatment, the method comprising: in a specimen ofbreast cancer cells from said individual, determining susceptibility ofat least a portion of said cells to cell growth inhibition by animmunoglobulin inhibitor mimicking compound by a method comprisingidentifying in at least a portion of said cells the expression of aPoly-Ig receptor or Poly-Ig-like receptor, or the Fc receptor regionthereof, that is capable of binding to said immunoglobulin inhibitormimicking compound and mediating immunoglobulin inhibition of breastcancer cell growth; and administering said immunoglobulin inhibitormimicking compound to said individual.
 10. The method of claim 9 furthercomprising administering an aromatase inhibitor to said individual. 11.The method of claim 9 further comprising administering a pureanti-estrogen compound to said individual.
 12. The method of claim 9further comprising administering to said individual an enhancer ofimmunoglobulin production.
 13. The method of claim 12 wherein saidenhancer is levimisole.
 14. The method of claim 12 wherein said enhanceris imiquimod.
 15. The method of claim 12 wherein said enhancer ispicibanil.
 16. The method of claim 12 wherein said enhancer is DHEA. 17.(canceled)
 18. (Canceled)
 19. The method of claim 9 further comprisingadministering at least one hormone to said individual.
 20. The method ofclaim 19 wherein said at least one hormone is chosen from pituitaryhormones, adrenal hormones, thyroid hormones, cytokines and neurogenichormones.
 21. The method of claim 20 wherein said at least one hormonecomprises progesterone. 22-28. (canceled)